Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
Attorneys Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Comey discuss with the judge whether Amanda can be referred to as a victim, as her name was not previously disclosed by the government.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| your Honor | person | 807 | View Entity |
| MS. MENNINGER | person | 1436 | View Entity |
| Ms. Comey | person | 1419 | View Entity |
| MR. PAGLIUCA | person | 1022 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00013329.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between attorneys and a judge. The discussion revolves around a procedural issue: whether the prosecution can refer to a person named Amanda Lazlo as a victim, given that her name was not previously disclosed to the defense as required by a court order. The attorneys debate the admissibility of testimony about Amanda from a witness named Carolyn the previous day, with Amanda's age (stated as 18) being a key point of contention.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.
Date unknown • Not specified
Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.
Date unknown • Not mentioned
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A witness, Meder, is questioned about a photograph showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The photograph, sourced from a CD (1B63) from the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, is admitted into evidence as Plaintiff's Exhibit 342.
2022-08-10 • Court
Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Legal argument regarding 'omission theory' and inconsistency in testimony.
2022-08-10 • Southern District of New York (implied by court reporters)
The conclusion of a cross-examination of witness Dr. Dubin by Ms. Moe, an objection by Mr. Pagliuca, and the witness being excused by the court.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Cross-examination of witness Jane by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding a deposition document from October 21, 2009.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event