Date Unknown
The voir dire (jury selection) for Ms. Maxwell's trial, during which Juror No. 50 allegedly gave false answers.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | person | 232 | View Entity |
| Ms. Maxwell | person | 1982 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009203.jpg
This legal document argues that the government's reliance on the Tanner and Ianniello legal precedents is incorrect in the case of Ms. Maxwell. The author contends that unlike those cases, the alleged misconduct by Juror No. 50 occurred outside the jury room, specifically through false answers during voir dire and subsequent self-publicity. The document asserts that Ms. Maxwell is entitled to an evidentiary hearing and that the juror's own actions in seeking the limelight are the reason the misconduct came to light.
Events with shared participants
Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.
2021-02-16 • MDC
Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.
Date unknown • prison/jail
Ms. Maxwell sent a detailed letter requesting the production of discovery materials.
2020-10-13
Indictment of Ms. Maxwell.
2020-01-01 • New York
Ms. Maxwell was arrested at her residence.
2020-07-02 • New Hampshire
Ms. Maxwell moved to stay discovery in the case 'Farmer v. Indyke' (No. 19-cv-10475) due to a pending criminal investigation.
Date unknown • S.D.N.Y.
An appeal challenging a protective order's bar on disclosure of information.
Date unknown
The jury is instructed on how to conduct their deliberations in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell.
2021-12-19
Case 22-1426, Document 87, filed on 07/27/2023.
Date unknown
Ms. Maxwell and John talked about the importance of details regarding the household tasks.
2001-05-18
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event