Date Unknown
The voir dire process for jury selection is discussed, during which Judge Pauley would have questioned potential juror Catherine M. Conrad.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. Conrad | person | 53 | View Entity |
| Judge Pauley | person | 146 | View Entity |
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010003.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The questioning focuses on her and her team's failure to conduct prior research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, whose name was identical to one found in a New York court opinion. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team of nearly two dozen people to perform this additional research before the voir dire process.
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad
2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Attorney Registration Information for Catherine M. Conrad was recorded.
2011-06-24
Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 48 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).
2007-12-18
Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 80 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).
2010-12-09
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event