January 01, 2021
The case of Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc., 987 F.3d 233, which is cited for the standard of examining an expert's analysis.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electra | person | 2 | View Entity |
| 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc. | organization | 2 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00005633.jpg
This page from a legal filing discusses the standards for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. It cites several key legal precedents, including Daubert and Kumho Tire, to outline the court's responsibility to ensure an expert's opinion is reliable and based on sound methodology. The document also specifies that even if testimony meets these standards, it can be excluded under other rules, such as Rule 704, which prohibits experts in criminal cases from opining on a defendant's mental state.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event