Event Details

November 13, 2009

Description

Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 made herself available for Defendant's exam

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Epstein's counsel person 25 View Entity
JANE DOE NO. 2 person 154 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

017.pdf

Legal Filing (Reply to Response to Motion for Preservation of Evidence) • 247 KB
View

Legal filing from November 2009 in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's attorneys reply to a response regarding the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), which was undergoing restructuring. The document notes that the Department of Justice had seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including 13 boxes related to the Epstein case, and alludes to serious ethical and criminal issues involving the RRA firm that could impact the validity of the cases against Epstein.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Edwards and Cassell filed a petition to enforce the rights of "Jane Doe No. 1" and "Jane Doe No. 2" under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771.

2008-01-01 • Federal court (S.D. Fla.)

View

Victims filed discovery requests with the Government, seeking information about Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and others.

2011-10-11 • Federal court (S.D. Fla.)

View

Acosta sends a letter to Epstein's counsel advising USAO will defer notification of state plea to state officials.

2007-12-19

View

A court proceeding where a victim, identified as Jane Doe No. 2, begins to give her testimony regarding trauma associated with Jeffrey Epstein.

2019-09-03 • Courtroom (implied)

View

U.S. Attorney's Office contacts Epstein's counsel to negotiate a resolution (nonprosecution agreement).

2007-01-01 • Southern District of Florida

View

Victims provide statements in a court proceeding related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB.

2019-09-03

View

State deposition of a victim where defense counsel questioned her about potential financial gain.

2008-02-20

View

Negotiations and communications occurred regarding the terms of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically focusing on the non-negotiable sexual offender registration and the details of his prison sentence.

2007-09-21

View

Epstein's counsel submitted a letter to the USAO arguing against federal prosecution.

2007-07-25

View

Epstein's counsel appealed to officials in Washington, D.C. to avoid enforcement of a requirement in the NPA. The appeal was rejected.

Date unknown • Washington, D.C.

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Not specified
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-12-26 04:12

Additional Data

Source
017.pdf
Date String
2009-11-13

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event