November 13, 2009
Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 made herself available for Defendant's exam
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epstein's counsel | person | 25 | View Entity |
| JANE DOE NO. 2 | person | 154 | View Entity |
017.pdf
Legal filing from November 2009 in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's attorneys reply to a response regarding the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), which was undergoing restructuring. The document notes that the Department of Justice had seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including 13 boxes related to the Epstein case, and alludes to serious ethical and criminal issues involving the RRA firm that could impact the validity of the cases against Epstein.
Events with shared participants
Edwards and Cassell filed a petition to enforce the rights of "Jane Doe No. 1" and "Jane Doe No. 2" under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771.
2008-01-01 • Federal court (S.D. Fla.)
Victims filed discovery requests with the Government, seeking information about Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and others.
2011-10-11 • Federal court (S.D. Fla.)
Acosta sends a letter to Epstein's counsel advising USAO will defer notification of state plea to state officials.
2007-12-19
A court proceeding where a victim, identified as Jane Doe No. 2, begins to give her testimony regarding trauma associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
2019-09-03 • Courtroom (implied)
U.S. Attorney's Office contacts Epstein's counsel to negotiate a resolution (nonprosecution agreement).
2007-01-01 • Southern District of Florida
Victims provide statements in a court proceeding related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB.
2019-09-03
State deposition of a victim where defense counsel questioned her about potential financial gain.
2008-02-20
Negotiations and communications occurred regarding the terms of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically focusing on the non-negotiable sexual offender registration and the details of his prison sentence.
2007-09-21
Epstein's counsel submitted a letter to the USAO arguing against federal prosecution.
2007-07-25
Epstein's counsel appealed to officials in Washington, D.C. to avoid enforcement of a requirement in the NPA. The appeal was rejected.
Date unknown • Washington, D.C.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event