Event Details
Unknown (Past)
Description
Post-trial allegation of juror bias
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| the defendant | person | 996 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009142.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Document 615) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's motion claiming juror bias, specifically discussing the legal standards for 'actual bias' versus 'implied' or 'inferable' bias in a post-trial context. The Government argues that actual bias is the only relevant inquiry and cites various legal precedents (Torres, Greer, Smith v. Phillips) to support the position that the defendant's arguments are unpersuasive.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Real Estate Purchase under fake name
Date unknown • Unknown
Carolyn engaged in sex acts with Epstein in exchange for money, arranged by the defendant.
Date unknown
The defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic Carolyn and other minors for sex.
Date unknown
The defendant personally recruited Virginia while she was a minor.
Date unknown • Virginia
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
An initial bail hearing was held where the Court expressed concerns about COVID-19 and found the Defendant had no underlying health conditions.
Date unknown
A hearing was held where the Court provided reasons for its determination, which are stated to still apply.
2020-07-14
The defendant transferred approximately $500,000 from a Swiss Bank account to her Trust Account.
2019-01-01
The Government filed a memorandum (Doc. 100, Exhibit F) in support of the Defendant's Renewed Motion for Release in Case 21-58.
2021-04-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event