Date Unknown
A 'meet and confer' between Plaintiff's counsel and Maxwell's counsel regarding the criminal investigation.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maxwell's counsel | person | 6 | View Entity |
| Plaintiff's counsel | person | 8 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00019318.jpg
This legal document, dated May 18, 2020, is a filing arguing against defendant Maxwell's request to stay discovery in a civil case. The author contends that Maxwell has failed to justify the stay based on a parallel criminal investigation and that a potential claims resolution program involving co-defendant Epstein's Estate does not require litigation to be paused. The filing cites court transcripts and case law to support the position that discovery should proceed, as it may even be necessary to facilitate settlement.
Events with shared participants
Plaintiff's counsel allegedly provided reporters from the Washington Post with submissions from a disciplinary proceeding.
2018-02-07 • Unknown
Epstein carried out a course of action against Plaintiff's counsel.
Date unknown • Legal proceedings
Plaintiff filed Motion for Order to Show Cause (DE#483)
2010-03-10 • Southern District of Florida
Maxwell's counsel filed a letter demanding Judge Nathan order the MDC Warden to appear regarding confinement conditions.
2020-11-24 • Court (SDNY)
Scheduled deposition of Igor Zinoview.
2009-12-18 • Unspecified
Maxwell's counsel filed a reply letter in support of a motion to stay a civil case (inferred from attachment name).
2020-09-04 • Court (Implied)
Disqualification of Plaintiff's prior counsel (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP implied due to Boies involvement).
2019-12-20 • Southern District of New York
Filing of a civil complaint (Friday prior to the email).
2020-01-17 • New York (implied)
USANYS contacted plaintiff's counsel regarding the filing.
2020-01-17 • N/A
Meet-and-confer session
2020-04-27 • N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event