Event Details

September 28, 2020

Description

Filing of Document 69 in Case 20-3061.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Legal Counsel person 2 View Entity
The government organization 3113 View Entity
GHISLAINE MAXWELL person 9575 View Entity

Source Documents (4)

DOJ-OGR-00019601.jpg

Legal Brief / Court Filing (Appellate) • 608 KB
View

Page 10 of a legal filing (Document 69) dated September 28, 2020, in Case 20-3061. The text argues for the validity of an interlocutory appeal under collateral order jurisdiction, countering the government's claim that issues have not been finally resolved. It discusses the government's use of subpoenas to obtain evidence for a criminal case and Maxwell's challenge to the legitimacy of those methods within the context of a civil appeal.

DOJ-OGR-00019595.jpg

Legal Filing / Appellate Brief (Page 4 of 15) • 638 KB
View

This is a page from a legal brief filed on September 28, 2020, in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 20-3061). The text argues that a district court's refusal to modify a protective order is immediately appealable under the 'collateral order doctrine.' The filing contends that the appeal is necessary to share 'critical new information' with Judge Preska before deposition materials in the civil case *Giuffre v. Maxwell* are unsealed, arguing that post-judgment review would be moot.

DOJ-OGR-00019594.jpg

Legal Filing / Court Brief (Appeal) • 604 KB
View

This document is page 3 of a legal brief (Case 20-3061) filed on September 28, 2020, arguing that the appellate court has jurisdiction to review a district court's decision regarding a protective order in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The text focuses on the 'collateral order doctrine' and cites legal precedents to support the claim that the unsealing order can be appealed immediately without waiting for the criminal trial to conclude. It mentions Ms. Maxwell's intention to stay the unsealing process.

DOJ-OGR-00019597.jpg

Legal Brief / Court Filing (Page 6 of 15) • 688 KB
View

This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated September 28, 2020, concerning Case 20-3061. It presents a legal argument distinguishing the current appeal from *Flanagan v. United States*, asserting that Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding Judge Nathan's order is comparable to a bail reduction motion because the harm (unsealing deposition materials) would be irreversible ("the cat is irretrievably out of the bag") if not addressed immediately. The text argues that Maxwell must be allowed to share information from Judge Nathan with Judge Preska to prevent the unsealing order from going into effect without reconsideration.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell

2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals

View

A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.

Date unknown

View

A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.

Date unknown

View

LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.

2020-07-29

View

Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail

2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)

View

The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.

2007-01-01

View

Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.

2016-01-01

View

The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.

2020-07-14

View

Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

2021-03-23 • US District Court

View

Arraignment. Defendant entered plea of Not Guilty. Trial set for July 12, 2021.

2020-07-14 • Video Conference / Telephone

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
2d Cir. Court of Appeals
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
4
Extracted
2025-11-20 21:21

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00019595.jpg
Date String
2020-09-28

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event