Event Details

January 01, 2003

Description

Decision of Stogner v. California.

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00021696.jpg

Legal Brief / Court Filing (Appellate) • 624 KB
View

This page is from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on June 29, 2023. It argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's interpretation of the statute of limitations under the PROTECT Act. The text asserts that Congress rejected a specific retroactivity clause not to limit the Act's scope entirely, but to avoid unconstitutional results (reviving time-barred crimes), while still intending to cover past conduct where the statute of limitations had not yet expired.

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Supreme Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
0
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 23:47

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021696.jpg
Date String
2003

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event