Event Details
January 01, 2019
Description
The case of United States v. Davis, which stated that a statutory phrase should have a fixed meaning.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | location | 4439 | View Entity |
| Davis | person | 94 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00002667.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated February 4, 2021, which argues for a specific interpretation of the statutory phrase "offense involving." It cites several court precedents, including cases like Kawashima v. Holder and United States v. Morgan, to support the position that this phrase requires looking at the essential elements of the crime itself, not merely the surrounding circumstances. The D.C. Circuit's analysis of a venue statute is used as a key example to illustrate that for an offense to 'involve' an activity like interstate transportation, that activity must be a formal element of the offense.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The United States purchased St. Thomas, St. John, and Saint Croix as a defensive strategy related to the Panama Canal during WWI.
1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands
The United States purchased St. Thomas, Saint John, and Saint Croix as part of a defensive strategy during the First World War.
1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands
The U.S. took possession of the islands.
1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands
U.S. citizenship was granted to the inhabitants of the islands.
1927-01-01 • U.S. Virgin Islands
The U.S. took possession of the islands from Denmark.
1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands
Intensification of the trade war between the United States and China.
Date unknown
Issuance of a report by 'Davis' that is critical of 'Leon' and the board, related to Caesars.
Date unknown
Nicholas Ribis predicts that 'Davis' would issue a report critical of 'Leon' and a board, referencing an article in the 'Post' business page about the 'Davis Report and Caesars'.
2016-01-01
Revision of the US-South Korea trade agreement.
2018-01-01
Reference period for calculating the 70% cap on South Korean steel exports to the US.
2015-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event