Event Details

Unknown

Description

Connecticut disciplinary hearing

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
DOE organization 4 View Entity
The Author (Expert) person 0 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00010129.jpg

Legal Filing / Court Document (Exhibit) • 954 KB
View

This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 522, filed April 6, 2012) discussing legal ethics, specifically the standard of knowledge required for an attorney to report fraud or perjury to a tribunal. It cites a case involving an attorney named 'Doe' where discipline was reversed because 'actual knowledge' of perjury is required, not just strong suspicion. The author of this document identifies themselves in a footnote as the expert witness who testified for Doe in the underlying Connecticut disciplinary hearing.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Deadline for discovery in the Doe case.

2011-05-31 • Court

View

Trial set date for the Doe case.

2011-07-14 • Court

View

Legal Conference

2021-12-21 • Southern District of New York

View

Deadline to file response in Doe v. Epstein

2009-05-29 • N/A

View

Government's Response to Petitioners' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in court.

2017-06-06

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Connecticut
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-12-26 13:13

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00010129.jpg
Date String
Unknown

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event