Unknown
Connecticut disciplinary hearing
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOE | organization | 4 | View Entity |
| The Author (Expert) | person | 0 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010129.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 522, filed April 6, 2012) discussing legal ethics, specifically the standard of knowledge required for an attorney to report fraud or perjury to a tribunal. It cites a case involving an attorney named 'Doe' where discipline was reversed because 'actual knowledge' of perjury is required, not just strong suspicion. The author of this document identifies themselves in a footnote as the expert witness who testified for Doe in the underlying Connecticut disciplinary hearing.
Events with shared participants
Deadline for discovery in the Doe case.
2011-05-31 • Court
Trial set date for the Doe case.
2011-07-14 • Court
Legal Conference
2021-12-21 • Southern District of New York
Deadline to file response in Doe v. Epstein
2009-05-29 • N/A
Government's Response to Petitioners' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in court.
2017-06-06
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event