Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

Jury selection process where Judge Nathan asked follow-up questions regarding jurors' personal experiences with sexual assault, abuse, or harassment.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Defendant (Maxwell) person 0 View Entity
prospective jurors person 14 View Entity
Judge Nathan person 619 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00021722.jpg

Unknown type • 708 KB
View

This legal document details the rejection of defendant Maxwell's appeal arguments concerning Juror 50. Judge Nathan found Maxwell's claim of implied bias, based on the juror's personal history, to be unfounded, noting that the defense failed to pursue follow-up questions during voir dire. The document upholds Judge Nathan's determination that Juror 50 was credible, despite erroneous questionnaire answers, and that his post-verdict statements were properly disregarded.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order

2020-10-02 • District Court

View

Submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's Response to Letter Motions to Quash subpoena to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.

2021-11-22 • Email/Court Filing

View

Filing date of the court document (Sentencing submission or transcript).

2022-08-22 • Court

View

A victim impact statement being delivered to a judge regarding the sentencing of Maxwell.

2023-06-29

View

An appeal by Ms. Maxwell addressing an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. (Case 20-3061)

Date unknown

View

Post-conviction bail proceedings.

Date unknown

View

Judge Nathan finding, three times, that the Government established Maxwell is a risk of flight and no bail conditions could reasonably assure her appearance in court.

Date unknown

View

Judge Preska declined to stay the unsealing process but stated she would reevaluate if Judge Nathan modified the criminal protective order.

Date unknown • Court

View

Maxwell asked Judge Nathan to modify the Protective Order to allow her to use discovery materials in civil cases.

2020-08-17 • District Court

View

Order regarding Local Rule 23.1 issued

2021-07-30 • Southern District of New York

View

Event Metadata

Type
Voir dire
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 16:20

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021722.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event