Date Unknown
Special Agent Jason Richards is called as a witness, sworn in, and begins his direct examination by Mr. Pagliuca.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jason Richards | person | 34 | View Entity |
| MR. PAGLIUCA | person | 1022 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00016783.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court trial held on August 10, 2022. After addressing the jury, the judge allows Mr. Pagliuca to call his next witness, Special Agent Jason Richards. Mr. Pagliuca begins the direct examination, during which Richards identifies himself as an FBI agent who investigates violations of United States laws.
Events with shared participants
A taped interview was conducted by the FBI with an individual represented by counsel, pursuant to a subpoena. The interview began at 4:21 p.m. and started with the collection of basic identifying information.
2007-04-24 • Undisclosed
A taped interview was conducted with an individual (name redacted) by the FBI and an Assistant U.S. Attorney. The interview was held pursuant to a subpoena. The initial part of the interview involved introductions and collecting basic identifying information from the interviewee.
2007-04-24 • Undisclosed
A taped interview was conducted with a redacted individual. The interview was held pursuant to a subpoena. The beginning of the interview involved introductions and the collection of basic identifying information from the interviewee.
2007-04-24 • Not specified
The witness is questioned about potential meetings with FBI agents Nesbit Kirkendall, Jason Richards, Tim Slater, and Junior Ortiz. The witness denies meeting any of them.
Date unknown • Unspecified
The witness is questioned about potential meetings with FBI agents Nesbit Kirkendall, Jason Richards, Tim Slater, and Junior Ortiz. The witness denies these meetings.
Date unknown • Unknown
Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.
Date unknown • Not mentioned
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Legal argument regarding 'omission theory' and inconsistency in testimony.
2022-08-10 • Southern District of New York (implied by court reporters)
The conclusion of a cross-examination of witness Dr. Dubin by Ms. Moe, an objection by Mr. Pagliuca, and the witness being excused by the court.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding a deposition document from October 21, 2009.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event