Event Details
Unknown (Current)
Description
Deposition of Mr. Rothstein
Participants (5)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Rothstein | person | 4 | View Entity |
| Ms. Haddad | person | 16 | View Entity |
| Mr. Nurik | person | 10 | View Entity |
| MR. SCAROLA | person | 157 | View Entity |
| MR. GOLDBERGER | person | 85 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017521.jpg
This document is a four-page condensed transcript (pages 122-125) from a deposition of Mr. Rothstein. Attorney Jack Scarola questions Rothstein to confirm that attorney Brad Edwards had no involvement in illegal activities at the RRA firm or the handling of Epstein cases, which Rothstein confirms. Rothstein acknowledges that lying would violate his agreement with the U.S. government and result in him 'dying in prison.' The transcript concludes with procedural discussions regarding the timeline for reviewing transcripts and a pending motion for summary judgment for Brad Edwards.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Conclusion of a sworn statement.
Date unknown • An unspecified location, not a courthouse.
A heated argument occurs during a legal deposition among the attorneys present. The dispute centers on procedural conduct, interruptions, and the nature of objections, specifically attorney-client privilege.
Date unknown • Deposition Room (unspecified)
A legal deposition involving a contentious argument between attorneys over questioning procedure and professional conduct.
Date unknown • Unknown
A legal deposition where attorneys are engaged in a heated procedural dispute. Mr. Tein attempts to ask questions, while Mr. Leopold objects and criticizes Mr. Tein's behavior, leading to a tense back-and-forth.
Date unknown • Undisclosed deposition room
A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness defended by Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger.
Date unknown • A room with a table.
A legal deposition took place, during which attorneys MR. LEOPOLD and MR. GOLDBERGER had a dispute over the validity of objections, leading MR. LEOPOLD to threaten to end the session.
2004-09-29 • Unspecified deposition room
Deposition of an unnamed witness regarding their interaction with Mr. Epstein. The questioning covers topics of comfort, fear, and inappropriate physical contact, all of which the witness denies.
Date unknown • Not specified
Deposition/interview of a witness. The transcript records a portion of this event, including a period where the discussion went 'off the record'.
Date unknown • Not specified
A contentious deposition takes place where participants argue over procedure and conduct. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction, and Mr. Leopold threatens to cancel the deposition due to interruptions and perceived aggression. A break is called.
Date unknown • Deposition Room
A deposition or interview where a witness is questioned about a past interaction with Mr. Epstein.
Date unknown • Not specified
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event