Event Details
January 05, 2022
Description
Judge Nathan issues an Order regarding Juror 50
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
| Judge Nathan | person | 619 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00008990.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing (Document 609) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated February 24, 2022. It is the conclusion of a motion filed on behalf of 'Juror 50' requesting that the Court release his Jury Questionnaire and voir dire transcript under seal to his attorney, the Prosecution, and the Defense. The filing argues that privacy concerns should not prevent Juror 50 from accessing his own documents, which are necessary to comply with a prior order from Judge Nathan regarding an inquiry into the juror's conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00008988.jpg
This page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) argues that 'Juror 50' must be allowed to review their own Jury Questionnaire and voir dire transcript. The filing asserts this review is necessary for the juror to address questions regarding their truthfulness about prior sexual abuse, in compliance with a January 5, 2022 order by Judge Nathan. It cites legal precedents regarding third-party intervention and privilege.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order
2020-10-02 • District Court
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's Response to Letter Motions to Quash subpoena to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
2021-11-22 • Email/Court Filing
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
Filing date of the court document (Sentencing submission or transcript).
2022-08-22 • Court
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
A victim impact statement being delivered to a judge regarding the sentencing of Maxwell.
2023-06-29
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event