Event Details
August 03, 2007
Description
Menchel left the USAO before the parties drafted the NPA.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Menchel | person | 201 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report investigating a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Epstein. It details the conflicting recollections of prosecutors Acosta and Lourie regarding a broad provision not to prosecute 'potential co-conspirators,' with Lourie suggesting it could have been a message to victims while Acosta focused on Epstein's punishment. OPR concludes the provision was likely intended to protect Epstein's four assistants and other employees, not victims or his influential associates, and that its inclusion was not carefully considered by the USAO.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Sloman becomes First Assistant United States Attorney; Menchel becomes Criminal Chief.
2006-10-02
A meeting occurred between Epstein's defense team and the prosecution, which was followed up by a letter from Sanchez.
2007-07-31
The USAO rejected the defense's proposal and countered with a required two-year term of imprisonment as part of a guilty plea to a federal felony.
2007-08-03
Villafaña and Menchel disagreed about the proposed state resolution for the federal investigation.
2007-01-01
A meeting occurred regarding the Epstein case, preceded by emails from Menchel stating Acosta was still deciding on a course of action.
2007-06-26
OPR investigated whether the USAO violated department policy and whether prosecutors were influenced by improper motives in the Epstein case.
Date unknown
Numerous meetings occurred between the subjects (prosecutors) and Epstein's team of nationally known attorneys.
Date unknown
CEOS Chief Oosterbaan emailed Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie, endorsing Villafaña’s legal analysis and proposed charges.
2007-07-18
Menchel's letter specifying an August 17 plea deadline was sent.
2007-08-03
Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie discussed perceived risks and concerns with the evidence and legal theories for a federal prosecution of Epstein.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event