January 01, 2007
Intense negotiations regarding the NPA.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lourie | person | 286 | View Entity |
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
| Villafaña | person | 551 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021334.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report regarding the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It concludes that attorneys Menchel, Sloman, Lourie, and Villafaña did not commit professional misconduct because they acted under the direction and approval of U.S. Attorney Acosta, who held broad discretionary authority. The report specifically notes that OPR found no violation of clear statutes or policies in the negotiation and entry into the NPA, including the controversial provision regarding the non-prosecution of unidentified third parties.
Events with shared participants
Correspondence regarding the resolution of a dispute and agreement terms concerning Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-12-13 • Unknown
Villafaña wrote to Epstein attorney Lefkowitz regarding a dispute resolution.
2007-12-13 • Unknown
Resolution of a dispute and negotiation of an agreement regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-12-13 • Unknown
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Sloman instructs Villafaña to provide Lefkowitz with draft victim notification letter.
2007-11-28
Lead case agent informed Villafaña that only 15 known victims had received notification letters.
2007-11-28
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
Villafaña completes draft prosecution memorandum.
2007-05-01
Villafaña sought to avoid defense accusations of misconduct by preparing a written notice to victims.
2007-11-01 • N/A
Sentencing hearing for McDaniel
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event