Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

Discussion of the defendant's motion for attorney-conducted voir dire (jury selection) due to pretrial publicity and the sensitive nature of the case.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
attorneys person 70 View Entity
defendant person 747 View Entity
court location 177 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00005252.jpg

legal document • 753 KB
View

This legal document is page 3 of a court filing from October 18, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details the court's reasoning for denying a defendant's request for attorney-conducted voir dire. The defendant argued for it based on significant pretrial publicity and the case's sensitive nature, but the court concluded that court-conducted voir dire is sufficient to ensure fairness and prevent potential prejudice, citing legal precedents.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.

Date unknown

View

The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.

2021-03-09

View

A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.

Date unknown

View

Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.

Date unknown

View

The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.

Date unknown

View

A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.

2020-07-30

View

Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.

2020-02-04 • New York

View

Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.

Date unknown

View

Discussion of a legal motion regarding the rules for cross-examination at an upcoming trial, specifically concerning the public disclosure of the names of Minor Victims.

Date unknown • Court

View

Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
legal proceeding
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:56

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00005252.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event