Event Details

August 10, 2022

Description

A legal argument during a court proceeding about the relevance of cross-examination questions directed at a witness regarding their attorney. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, argues that the jury should know about the witness's attorney's involvement in the Epstein Fund and a book written about the witness.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
MR. ROHRBACH person 523 View Entity
Ms. Sternheim person 877 View Entity
The Court organization 2003 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00018355.jpg

Unknown type • 603 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys and the judge. Attorney Ms. Sternheim argues for the relevance of questioning a witness about their attorney, who is present in the courtroom. Sternheim contends that the attorney's role in the 'Epstein Fund' and the fact that he wrote a book about the witness's story are pertinent facts for the jury to consider during cross-examination.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.

2022-08-10

View

A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.

2022-08-10 • courthouse

View

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.

2020-07-14

View

A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Jury Deliberation/Instruction

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Initial bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, which was held 12 days after her arrest.

Date unknown

View

An initial bail hearing was held where the Court expressed concerns about COVID-19 and found the Defendant had no underlying health conditions.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Court Hearing
Location
courtroom
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 17:25

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00018355.jpg
Date String
2022-08-10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event