Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
An investigation by the OPR into whether any subjects violated rules or were improperly motivated in their handling of the Epstein case and NPA.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OPR | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021194.jpg
This document is a table of contents from a legal report, likely by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), concerning the federal investigation of Epstein. The report's findings, as outlined here, conclude that U.S. Attorney Acosta and other subjects did not violate any professional standards or policies when they entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein. The document also indicates the report found no evidence that the subjects were improperly influenced by corruption or by Epstein's status and wealth.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
OPR conducted an investigation which involved obtaining records, conducting interviews, and reviewing public documents related to the Epstein case.
Date unknown
OPR conducted extensive interviews under oath of five subjects involved in the Epstein investigation.
Date unknown
OPR conducted more than 60 interviews of witnesses.
Date unknown
OPR investigated whether the USAO violated department policy and whether prosecutors were influenced by improper motives in the Epstein case.
Date unknown
OPR's investigation occurred approximately 12 years after the USAO's investigation of Epstein.
Date unknown
The initiation and scope of OPR's investigation into the Epstein case.
Date unknown
The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) conducted a review and interviews regarding the facts and circumstances of the Epstein NPA negotiation.
Date unknown
OPR questioned Lourie, Menchel, Sloman, and Acosta about the timeline for reviewing the prosecution memorandum and proposed charges in the Epstein case.
Date unknown
The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) conducted a review of hundreds of thousands of pages of documents related to the Epstein investigation.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
EOUSA investigated a data gap in Acosta's email records at the request of OPR.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event