July 11, 2008
Hearing Transcript (Hr’g Tr.) cited where Petitioners agreed the best they can get is the right to confer
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Petitioners | person | 6 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00000317.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (likely by the DOJ) arguing that the Petitioners' claims are unripe. The government contends that the Petitioners are not precluded from conferring with government attorneys in other districts about pursuing charges against Epstein not covered by the Non-Prosecution Agreement. It cites case law to support the dismissal of claims based on future, hypothetical events.
Events with shared participants
Analysis of legal principles regarding the setting aside of a Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically concerning Epstein's criminal prosecution and guilty plea, and the necessity of parties in contract challenges.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
The Court issued an Order related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
2011-09-26
Dist. Ct. closes CVRA case and denies petitioners' request for remedies.
2019-09-16
Petitioners' petition for rehearing en banc granted.
2020-08-07
The district judge denied the petitioners' motion for remedies and closed the CVRA case following Epstein's death.
2019-09-16
Petitioners in the CVRA litigation filed a motion seeking access to the NPA.
2008-08-01 • Federal Court
The court ordered the government to provide petitioners with a copy of the NPA subject to a protective order.
2008-08-21 • Federal Court
A court hearing where it was acknowledged that prosecutors had spoken to Petitioners about what happened to them. The transcript is cited as 'July 11, 2008 Hr’g Tr.'
2008-07-11
Motion regarding unsealing of correspondence (mentioned in footnote).
2011-04-07 • Court
CVRA litigation
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event