October 15, 2020
Technical review of e-discovery search terms and responsiveness hits for the US v. Epstein case.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| REDACTED | person | 1709 | View Entity |
EFTA00027052.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from October 15, 2020, discussing the technical details of document production and e-discovery for the case 'US v. Epstein'. The participants discuss refining search terms to identify 'junk' versus 'responsive' documents, specifically troubleshooting a keyword search that inadvertently captured responsive material. The conversation involves two distinct databases or search sets: 'US v. Epstein database' and 'US v. Epstein (SW)'.
Events with shared participants
Acceptance of an Epstein-related Touhy request
2020-05-15 • N/A
Proposed meeting/activity mentioned in message: 'we can do tomorrow from 3 pm'
2019-06-11 • Likely 'my house' (Redacted sender's residence)
Filming event mentioned as 'two weeks ago . thefilms you shot in my house'
2019-05-01 • Redacted sender's house
The last recorded login date for the profile owner on MySpace.
2006-03-05 • MySpace.com
A redacted individual called Mr. Epstein.
2004-05-03
A redacted individual sent a message to Mr Epstein stating that she was running late.
2003-03-20
A message was left indicating that a redacted person had arrived.
Date unknown
Travel for Witness Interview (California)
2019-12-15 • Santa Monica, CA
Conversation discussing the #MeToo movement context ('Believe the woman mantra') and the UVA Rolling Stone retraction.
2018-09-17 • Digital Correspondence
A redacted individual telephoned the author of the report to inform them of a meeting that occurred with Atty. Jack Goldberger.
2006-06-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event