Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
Witness Ms. Chapell is questioned by Mr. Rohrbach about Government Exhibit 802, which she identifies as an invoice related to Jeffrey E. Epstein.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Chapell | person | 26 | View Entity |
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00013564.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where government exhibits are being entered into evidence. Attorney Mr. Rohrbach questions a witness, Ms. Chapell, who identifies Government Exhibit 802 as an invoice connected to Jeffrey E. Epstein's account. The government then requests that this exhibit be placed under seal.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A legal argument took place regarding the definition of 'dominant purpose' for jury instructions in a case involving crossing state lines for criminal sexual conduct.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning the interpretation of New Mexico law on illegal sexual activity and how evidence should be presented to the jury. The Court indicates it will consider the points raised and re-propose instructions.
2021-12-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Cross-examination of witness Ms. Chapell by attorney Mr. Everdell in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion in court regarding the testimony and evidence for Exhibit 52.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A court hearing where the admissibility of testimony from Mr. Grumbridge and Dr. Loftus is being discussed.
2022-08-10
Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the sufficiency of proof at trial, and the potential application of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction to the jury, particularly concerning cases involving children.
2022-08-10 • court
A discussion in court with the jury not present, where a witness is excused and procedural matters regarding inconsistent statements are discussed between the judge and attorneys.
2022-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event