Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
A cross-examination of a witness named Jane, during which a procedural argument occurs between Ms. Menninger and the Court.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane | person | 608 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| MS. MENNINGER | person | 1436 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00017666.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between an attorney, Ms. Menninger, and the judge. The discussion centers on the proper procedure for impeaching a witness who claims not to recall a prior statement made to the FBI. The judge explains that a claim of not recalling is not an inconsistent statement and details the standard process of using a 302 form to refresh the witness's recollection.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
One of three flights shown to the witness, which may have had a passenger with the first name 'Jane'.
1996-01-01
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.
Date unknown • Not specified
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The witness, Jane, hired an attorney, Mr. Glassman.
2019-01-01
Jane's flight from New Jersey to New Mexico.
1997-01-01 • New Jersey to New Mexico
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event