Event Details
April 16, 2021
Description
Judges McMahon and Netburn ruled on the application of the Martindell standard.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge McMahon | person | 29 | View Entity |
| Judge Netburn | person | 20 | View Entity |
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00003040.jpg
This document is page 106 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The text details the Government's argument that it did not circumvent the 'Martindell' legal standard when seeking evidence previously under protective orders, specifically referring to a subpoena issued to the law firm Boies Schiller. It notes that Judges McMahon and Netburn ruled that the Government had demonstrated 'extraordinary circumstances' justifying the release of testimony to the grand jury despite previous protective orders.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.
2016-01-01
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
Victims filed discovery requests with the Government, seeking information about Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and others.
2011-10-11 • Federal court (S.D. Fla.)
Filing of Government's conclusion requesting dismissal of Maxwell's appeal.
2020-09-16 • New York, New York
The Court issued an order setting a briefing schedule for Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail motion, with submissions due on December 8, 16, and 18, 2020.
2020-12-07
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
Filing of Document 185-1 in Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC.
2021-03-24 • Court (Southern District of NY implied via White Plains)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event