Date Unknown
The court applied the 'Annabi' rule to the NPA without conducting a choice-of-law analysis or granting an evidentiary hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00021087.jpg
This legal document is a page from a defendant's brief arguing that the court made an error. The defendant contends the court improperly applied the 'Annabi' rule from the Second Circuit to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that was negotiated in Florida, which falls under the Eleventh Circuit. The argument is that since the NPA was negotiated with Florida prosecutors in exchange for Epstein's guilty plea in a Florida state court, Eleventh Circuit law should apply instead.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event