Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

The court applied the 'Annabi' rule to the NPA without conducting a choice-of-law analysis or granting an evidentiary hearing.

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00021087.jpg

Unknown type • 625 KB
View

This legal document is a page from a defendant's brief arguing that the court made an error. The defendant contends the court improperly applied the 'Annabi' rule from the Second Circuit to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that was negotiated in Florida, which falls under the Eleventh Circuit. The argument is that since the NPA was negotiated with Florida prosecutors in exchange for Epstein's guilty plea in a Florida state court, Eleventh Circuit law should apply instead.

Event Metadata

Type
court ruling
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
0
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:24

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021087.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event