Event Details
October 29, 2009
Description
Deadline to Disclose Experts and Exchange Reports (passed)
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| plaintiff | person | 42 | View Entity |
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
017.pdf
Legal filing from November 2009 in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's attorneys reply to a response regarding the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), which was undergoing restructuring. The document notes that the Department of Justice had seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including 13 boxes related to the Epstein case, and alludes to serious ethical and criminal issues involving the RRA firm that could impact the validity of the cases against Epstein.
057.pdf
This document is a legal reply filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on November 16, 2009, regarding the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA). The filing notes that the Department of Justice seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including 13 boxes specifically related to Epstein cases. The document highlights scheduling conflicts involving the deposition of Herbert Stettin (RRA's Chief Restructuring Officer) and alludes to potential ethical or criminal issues within RRA that could impact the validity of the cases against Epstein.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Approximate start of abuse against Plaintiff (26 years prior to 2020, when she was 14).
1994-01-01 • Unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
Discussion of a legal motion regarding the rules for cross-examination at an upcoming trial, specifically concerning the public disclosure of the names of Minor Victims.
Date unknown • Court
Jane, the defendant, and Epstein were at Interlochen
1994-01-01 • Interlochen
Jane, the defendant, and Epstein flew to New York
Date unknown • New York
Jane's return flight, potentially aided by the defendant, which is a subject of inquiry in the Jury Note regarding Count Four.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event