Event Details
August 27, 2019
Description
District court hearing where over a dozen victims spoke.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epstein's Victims | person | 5 | View Entity |
| district court | organization | 595 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00003183.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the timeline following Jeffrey Epstein's August 2019 suicide, including the dismissal of his indictment in SDNY and the conclusion of CVRA litigation in Florida where the court found the government had not litigated in bad faith but had violated the CVRA. It summarizes the appellate history of 'Jane Doe 1' seeking a writ of mandamus in the 11th Circuit regarding the non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Additionally, it marks the initiation of the OPR investigation into DOJ attorney misconduct, triggered by a request from Senator Ben Sasse following the Miami Herald's November 2018 reporting.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The District Court denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss an indictment.
Date unknown
Denial of Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order.
2020-09-02 • SDNY
District court's opinion in the CVRA litigation
2019-01-01
District court issued an opinion concluding that the government violated the CVRA by failing to consult with victims before entering the NPA.
2019-02-21
The District Court's judgment of conviction for Maxwell was issued.
2022-06-29 • District Court
The District Court denied Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial.
Date unknown • District Court
A trial where the Government presented evidence, including Jane's testimony, and the jury was instructed by the District Court.
Date unknown • District Court
A victim, later joined by a second victim, filed an emergency petition in federal court for enforcement of her rights under the CVRA.
2008-01-01 • Southern District of Florida
The District Court found that Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, partly based on pilot testimony.
Date unknown • District Court
The Second Circuit issued a writ of mandamus in 'In re U.S.', reversing a District Court's order that directed the Government to produce oral statements from defendants and coconspirators.
1987-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event