Event Details
post-verdict
Description
Juror No. 50 publicly discussed his beliefs about the science of memory, stating that his own memory is like a video-tape.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | person | 232 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009896.jpg
This legal filing argues that the government is mischaracterizing the record concerning Juror No. 50's responses during jury selection. The document contends that, unlike other jurors, Juror No. 50's specific claim of childhood sexual abuse was directly relevant to the case, and had he disclosed his belief that memory works 'like a video-tape' during the trial, the Court would have questioned his ability to fairly evaluate expert testimony on the topic.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The process where potential jurors, including Juror No. 50, were questioned. The document discusses how Juror No. 50 answered Question 48 during this time.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
A jury returned its verdict in a case, less than one week before January 4, 2022.
2022-01-04
Lucia Osborne-Crowley interviewed Juror No. 50 for an article.
2022-01-04
The Independent published an article based on the interview with Juror No. 50.
2022-01-04
Juror No. 50 was a victim of sexual assault and abuse.
Date unknown
Juror No. 50 revealed his experience with abuse to the jury, which was fundamental to the verdict.
Date unknown • jury room
The jury selection process during which Juror No. 50 allegedly provided false answers.
Date unknown • Court
Juror No. 50 sat for an interview as part of an hour-long documentary called “Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile.”
Date unknown
Juror No. 50 engaged in a publicity tour, giving multiple interviews to news outlets.
2022-01-01
A Daily Mail reporter questioned Juror No. 50 about his answer to Question 48 on a questionnaire.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event