Event Details

April 14, 2009

Description

Attempted service of process at Kellen's residence.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Process Servers (implied) person 2 View Entity
Doorman person 0 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

048.pdf

Legal Pleading (Reply to Plaintiff's Response) • 271 KB
View

This is a legal reply filed by Sarah Kellen's attorney in July 2009, requesting the court set aside a default judgment in the case brought by Jane Doe II. The document argues that service of process in New York was legally deficient because the 'nail and mail' method was used without proper due diligence (attempts were made when Kellen was known to be out of town) and that the default was entered prematurely before the response deadline. Kellen also asserts a meritorious defense, stating she did not conspire with Jeffrey Epstein to commit sexual battery and was unaware of what occurred privately between Epstein and the Plaintiff.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

An incident where the witness was allegedly hidden in a kitchen to avoid process servers. The witness's manager, Justin, is said to have lied about the witness's presence to assist them.

Date unknown • A kitchen at an unspecified location (possibly a workplace, as per the redacted portion on line 10).

View

Summons delivered to a doorman at a building where plaintiff allegedly has an apartment.

2009-04-25 • New York (implied)

View

Attempted service of Summons and Complaint on Sarah Kellen.

2009-04-14 • 301 East 66th Street, New York, NY

View

Alleged date of service attempt where papers were left with 'Mark'.

2010-10-08 • 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
New York
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-12-26 04:09

Additional Data

Source
048.pdf
Date String
2009-04-14

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event