April 14, 2009
Attempted service of process at Kellen's residence.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Process Servers (implied) | person | 2 | View Entity |
| Doorman | person | 0 | View Entity |
048.pdf
This is a legal reply filed by Sarah Kellen's attorney in July 2009, requesting the court set aside a default judgment in the case brought by Jane Doe II. The document argues that service of process in New York was legally deficient because the 'nail and mail' method was used without proper due diligence (attempts were made when Kellen was known to be out of town) and that the default was entered prematurely before the response deadline. Kellen also asserts a meritorious defense, stating she did not conspire with Jeffrey Epstein to commit sexual battery and was unaware of what occurred privately between Epstein and the Plaintiff.
Events with shared participants
An incident where the witness was allegedly hidden in a kitchen to avoid process servers. The witness's manager, Justin, is said to have lied about the witness's presence to assist them.
Date unknown • A kitchen at an unspecified location (possibly a workplace, as per the redacted portion on line 10).
Summons delivered to a doorman at a building where plaintiff allegedly has an apartment.
2009-04-25 • New York (implied)
Attempted service of Summons and Complaint on Sarah Kellen.
2009-04-14 • 301 East 66th Street, New York, NY
Alleged date of service attempt where papers were left with 'Mark'.
2010-10-08 • 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event