Event Details

This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 120) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the names and contact information for the attorneys from three different law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell in this case.

This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 120) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on January 25, 2021. The text argues legal standards for the 'Severance of Offenses,' citing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14 and various precedents regarding when charges should be tried separately to avoid prejudice to the defendant. It lists numerous case citations including U.S. v. Mitan, U.S. v. Bradford, and U.S. v. Burke to support the argument that misjoined counts must be severed.

This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. The filing outlines arguments concerning the joinder and severance of offenses, specifically distinguishing between "Mann Act Counts" and "Perjury Counts," and argues that the perjury counts should be severed to avoid substantially prejudicing Ms. Maxwell at trial.

This document is page 4 (marked as 'iii') of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated January 25, 2021. It is a Table of Authorities listing relevant Statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 1623, 2422, 2423(a)) and Rules (Fed. R. Crim. P. 8(a), 14(a), and Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7) cited in the main document. The page bears the Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002282.

This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 120) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 25, 2021. The text presents legal arguments and case citations regarding the severance of charges and 'joinder,' specifically arguing that perjury counts should not be joined with substantive crimes if they are not sufficiently connected physically, temporally, or transactionally. The document cites precedents such as *United States v. Rivera*, *Randazzo*, and *Potamitis* to support the argument that unrelated offenses should be tried separately.