Event Details
Unknown (Past)
Description
Direct examination of Jane
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS. POMERANTZ | person | 906 | View Entity |
| JANE | person | 1277 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00013884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by context and LCGVMAX1 code). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that photographs sent by a witness ('Jane') to Ms. Espinosa, an employee who worked in Epstein's office daily, should be admitted as evidence to show 'Jane' maintained relationships with Epstein's circle after claiming to flee. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz counters that the evidence is irrelevant because the witness already acknowledged maintaining such relationships during direct examination.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A meeting involving the witness (Jane) and Epstein.
1994-01-01 • Unknown
Filing of the court transcript regarding sentencing calculations.
2022-08-22 • Court (Southern District)
A discussion during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) about the scope of cross-examination.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court filing date of the transcript containing the testimony.
2022-08-10 • Southern District of New York (implied by case number and reporter)
Trip to New York to see The Lion King
Date unknown • New York
A trip to New Mexico involving Jane.
Date unknown • New Mexico
Professor Elizabeth Loftus is qualified as an expert witness in the field of memory science and begins her direct examination, explaining the basic principles of memory to the jury.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event