Event Details
April 16, 2021
Description
Filing of Document 207 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAXWELL | person | 1792 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00020763.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, argues that a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) does not bind the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Citing Second Circuit precedent, particularly United States v. Annabi, the filing asserts that such agreements are limited to the district in which they are made unless they explicitly state a broader scope. The document refutes an opposing argument from an individual named Maxwell, stating the NPA lacks the necessary language to apply to other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00020772.jpg
This document is page 13 of a court order (filed April 16, 2021) in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's rejection of Maxwell's argument regarding the statute of limitations, specifically concerning the 2003 PROTECT Act and retroactive application of laws to past conduct. The legal analysis relies on precedents such as 'Weingarten' and 'Landgraf'.
DOJ-OGR-00020784.jpg
This page is from a legal ruling in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text discusses the legal complexities of trying Maxwell for both perjury and Mann Act charges simultaneously, specifically focusing on the potential conflict of interest and prejudice if her civil attorneys are called as witnesses. The Court weighs the burden of separate trials against the lack of overlap in evidence between the perjury and sex trafficking charges.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail
2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.
2016-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event