Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
A discussion between the judge and two attorneys (Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe) about how to interpret and respond to a confusing note sent by the jury.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | person | 1588 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| MS. MENNINGER | person | 1436 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00017324.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe. They are debating how to respond to a confusing note from the jury, as the placement of a comma in the jury's question drastically changes its meaning regarding responsibility for a flight to New Mexico. Ms. Moe argues that the note is too ambiguous to answer directly and suggests referring the jury back to their instructions.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.
Date unknown • Not specified
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A summation by Ms. Moe recounting Jane's testimony was filed with the court.
2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness Hesse regarding message taking procedures.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event