Event Details
April 01, 2021
Description
An attorney, MR. COHEN, makes a concluding argument to a judge to grant bail for his client.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR. COHEN | person | 88 | View Entity |
| your Honor | person | 807 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00001074.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, is making a concluding argument to a judge to grant bail for his client. He argues that the government has failed to meet its burden of proving the client is a flight risk, distinguishing the current case from others and citing a precedent from Judge Raggi in the Sabhnani case before formally requesting the court to grant bail.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A discussion in court to establish a motion schedule for a legal case.
Date unknown • Courtroom
An attorney makes a statement to the judge regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Mr. Everdell questions witness Mr. Sud about his residence and his employment history and role at Shoppers Travel.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A summation is being given in a trial, arguing that accusers' memories have shifted over time.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A long trial is mentioned as the context for the events being discussed.
Date unknown • Court
Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the sufficiency of proof at trial, and the potential application of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction to the jury, particularly concerning cases involving children.
2022-08-10 • court
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A court hearing where the government is arguing that the defendant is a flight risk and should not be released.
2021-04-01 • United States
A lawyer is presenting arguments to a judge regarding a client's case, discussing past conduct (1994-1997), bail factors (3142 factors), and the client's custody. The judge interrupts to ask for clarification from Mr. Cohen.
Date unknown • Court (implied by 'THE COURT', 'Second Circuit', 'Supreme Court', 'Southern District')
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event