July 29, 2025
A legal document was filed with the court, arguing for the necessity of redactions to protect victim-related information.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAMELA J. BONDI | person | 22 | View Entity |
| JAY CLAYTON | person | 22 | View Entity |
| TODD BLANCHE | person | 383 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00000755.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, dated July 29, 2025. It is submitted by attorneys from the U.S. Department of Justice, including Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi and signed by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton, concluding an argument that redactions are necessary to protect victim-related information.
Events with shared participants
Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about Reid Hoffman getting massages.
Date unknown
Discussion about a list of multiple masseuses that Ghislaine Maxwell might have encountered in discovery.
Date unknown
Discussion about a 'significant differential', 'underage situation', and details from a trial.
Date unknown
Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's recollection of an event or party in London with Prince Andrew, and a redacted individual.
Date unknown • London
Discussion about Andrew potentially visiting a house to see Ghislaine Maxwell or Epstein.
Date unknown • house
Mr. Blanche met with Ms. Maxwell, seemingly at her request, to obtain information.
Date unknown
Conversation/deposition regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein, his connection to her father, and the existence of any client lists or 'black books'. Maxwell denies ever meeting or hearing of Epstein before a certain point and denies knowledge of any such lists.
Date unknown
Filing of Document 70 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB.
2025-08-05 • Southern District of New York
The filing of this document, Document 800, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2025-08-04 • Southern District of New York
Filing of Document 61 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB.
2025-07-18
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event