Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

A team at Brune's firm, including Ms. Trzaskoma and two lawyers from San Francisco, gathered information about potential jurors for a specific case.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
two lawyers from San Francisco person 0 View Entity
Brune person 216 View Entity
Ms. Trzaskoma person 103 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009993.jpg

Unknown type • 406 KB
View

This document is a page from a legal transcript dated March 22, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Brune. Brune is being questioned about his law firm's process for jury selection, confirming that his partner, Ms. Trzaskoma (also called Theresa), was heavily involved in the details of gathering information on jurors, while he maintained ultimate responsibility and a supervisory role. The effort was collaborative, also involving two lawyers from San Francisco.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Investigation requested by Ms. Trzaskoma.

0012-05-01 • Unknown

View

A discussion was held regarding Catherine Conrad's potential status as a suspended lawyer, prompted by Ms. Trzaskoma. The group reviewed voir dire responses and decided against further research.

Date unknown

View

Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.

Date unknown • Unspecified

View

Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).

Date unknown

View

A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.

Date unknown

View

Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.

Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)

View

The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.

Date unknown

View

Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding a colleague's involvement in a trial and his own legal experience.

Date unknown • Court proceeding

View

The witness, Brune, was out of the country.

0015-05-01 • out of the country

View

Event Metadata

Type
Jury Selection Preparation
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 17:59

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009993.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event