Event Details

November 04, 2021

Description

Jury Questionnaire Session

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
jury department organization 22 View Entity
prospective jurors person 14 View Entity
Juror 50 person 685 View Entity

Source Documents (2)

DOJ-OGR-00020981.jpg

Court Order / Legal Ruling (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) • 695 KB
View

This document is a court ruling from April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court rejects the Defendant's argument that 'Juror 50' was biased for failing to follow instructions during the jury questionnaire phase. The Court accepts Juror 50's testimony that while he was distracted (thinking about his ex) during the questionnaire, he was fully attentive and compliant during voir dire and the actual trial.

DOJ-OGR-00008246.jpg

Court Transcript • 598 KB
View

This document is a transcript from a pretrial conference held on December 8, 2021, for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over the session, with legal teams for both the government (led by Maurene Comey) and the defense (led by Bobbi C. Sternheim) introducing themselves. The primary purpose of the conference is to discuss the logistics of jury selection (voir dire) and review lists of prospective jurors based on questionnaires administered in November.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status

2021-11-04 • N/A

View

Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post

2022-01-01 • Twitter

View

A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.

Date unknown

View

A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.

Date unknown • The Court

View

Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.

Date unknown

View

Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.

Date unknown

View

A hearing where Juror 50 provided testimony.

Date unknown

View

A close, contested trial involving Ms. Maxwell where the key issue was the credibility of the accusers.

Date unknown

View

During the jury selection for Ms. Maxwell's trial, Juror 50 failed to disclose his claimed victim status, which is argued to have robbed Ms. Maxwell of a fair trial.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Court context
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-20 22:02

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00020981.jpg
Date String
Unknown

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event