Event Details
Unknown (Transcript Date)
Description
Examination of Lisa Rocchio
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS. POMERANTZ | person | 906 | View Entity |
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
| Lisa Rocchio | person | 10 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00018101.jpg
This document is an 'Index of Examination' page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the testimony of three witnesses: Paul Kane, Lisa Rocchio, and Juan Patricio Alessi, detailing the attorneys who questioned them (Rohrbach, Menninger, Pomerantz, Comey) and the corresponding page numbers. It also lists various Government Exhibits (Nos. 761, 298, 297, 299, 606, 113, 114, and 2A/2C-2W) and the pages where they were received into evidence.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A discussion during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) about the scope of cross-examination.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A legal argument took place regarding the definition of 'dominant purpose' for jury instructions in a case involving crossing state lines for criminal sexual conduct.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning the interpretation of New Mexico law on illegal sexual activity and how evidence should be presented to the jury. The Court indicates it will consider the points raised and re-propose instructions.
2021-12-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Court filing date of the transcript containing the testimony.
2022-08-10 • Southern District of New York (implied by case number and reporter)
Professor Elizabeth Loftus is qualified as an expert witness in the field of memory science and begins her direct examination, explaining the basic principles of memory to the jury.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event