Unspecified (Trial)
Closing arguments/Summation where Ms. Menninger allegedly argued Maxwell was a substitute for Epstein.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jury | person | 126 | View Entity |
| MS. MENNINGER | person | 1436 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00017180.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Ms. Moe and the Court regarding defense attorney Ms. Menninger's closing summation. The prosecution argues that the defense improperly suggested to the jury that the government was using Ms. Maxwell as a substitute for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein.
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.
Date unknown • Not specified
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Projected start of opening statements.
2021-11-29 • SDNY
A witness, Meder, is questioned about a photograph showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The photograph, sourced from a CD (1B63) from the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, is admitted into evidence as Plaintiff's Exhibit 342.
2022-08-10 • Court
Cross-examination of witness Jane by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding redactions and public release of evidence.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event