Prior to 2019
Sophisticated three-year investigation by feds in Florida.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein (implied) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| feds | organization | 12 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00000421.jpg
This document is page 16 of a court transcript filed on July 16, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A defense attorney argues that the current indictment is an illegitimate 'do-over' of a previous investigation conducted in Florida regarding allegations from 2002-2005, which had been resolved via a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The speaker contends that revisiting these facts undermines the integrity of plea deals with the United States and begins to argue the definition of sex trafficking.
Events with shared participants
A 'massage' involving the witness. The questioning on this page focuses on the events that occurred after this massage.
Date unknown • Unspecified
A witness was driven to Mr. Epstein's house. During the drive, the female driver advised the witness about the potential encounter with Mr. Epstein.
Date unknown • In a vehicle en route to Mr. Epstein's house
Removal of evidence (hard drives, cameras) prior to police search.
Date unknown • Epstein's House
The defendant was often traveling with 'them' (presumably Maxwell and Epstein) and with Kellen.
Date unknown
A three-year investigation into Mr. Epstein's conduct began after an allegation was received by local police.
2005-01-01 • Florida
Does v. United States (Epstein Case) court decision
2011-01-01 • S.D. Fla.
Negotiation, execution, and implementation of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement).
Date unknown • N/A
Meeting regarding 'big transaction' mentioned by Alan.
2016-10-04 • Unknown
Period of alleged conduct/allegations mentioned in the indictment.
2002-01-01 • Florida (and potentially elsewhere)
Signing of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event