Event Details
November 09, 2023
Description
Settlement Hearing scheduled to determine fairness of the settlement.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| attorneys | person | 70 | View Entity |
| Class Members | person | 0 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
EFTA00037109.pdf
This document is a legal objection to a proposed $290 million class action settlement in the case of Jane Doe 1 v. Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase. Filed by the Marsh Law Firm on behalf of an anonymous Epstein survivor, the objection argues that the settlement amount is inadequate, the allocation plan is arbitrary, and the requested attorney fees (30%) are excessive. The filing also alleges potential conflicts of interest regarding Class Counsel's prior relationships with Epstein associates and requests that the Objector be allowed to appear virtually at the fairness hearing.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Jury deliberations during which the jury sent a note inquiring about the proper basis to convict under Count Four.
Date unknown
The document is an argument concerning the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell, specifically regarding the application of guideline § 4B1.5.
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
The document discusses arguments and evidence to be presented at an upcoming trial, including the Government's intention to argue certain individuals are co-conspirators.
Date unknown
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event