Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
In *Weingarten*, the Second Circuit considered, but did not ultimately reach, the issue of whether Section 3283 applies retroactively.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weingarten | person | 55 | View Entity |
| Second Circuit | organization | 869 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00002994.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated April 16, 2021, analyzes the permissibility of applying statutes of limitation retroactively. It discusses several Second Circuit precedents, distinguishing between impermissibly reviving time-barred claims (*In re Enterprise Mortgage*) and permissibly altering filing periods for live claims (*Vernon*). The text also references an opinion by Judge Learned Hand on the fairness of extending an active criminal statute of limitations.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Meeting of Holder and Weingarten during their early years at the Justice Department.
Date unknown • Justice Department
The case of *Weingarten v. United States*, 865 F.3d 48, 58–60 (2d Cir. 2017) is cited as a Second Circuit decision arguing for a case-specific approach, and its reasoning is adopted by the current court.
2017-01-01
Discussion and interpretation of the application of § 3283 statute of limitations, referencing Supreme Court and Circuit Court precedents regarding war frauds and child sex abuse statutes.
Date unknown
The Second Circuit issued a writ of mandamus in 'In re U.S.', reversing a District Court's order that directed the Government to produce oral statements from defendants and coconspirators.
1987-01-01
The case United States v. King, where the Second Circuit upheld sealing parts of the record based on jurors' privacy interests.
Date unknown • United States
The Second Circuit denied Maxwell’s petition for rehearing.
2024-11-25
In the Palmieri case, the Second Circuit reversed a district court's decision to grant the state Attorney General's motion to modify sealing orders.
Date unknown
The Second Circuit held in *Vernon v. Cassadaga Valley Cent. School Dist.* that a new statute shortening the filing period for a civil claim applied retroactively.
Date unknown
The Second Circuit held in *In re Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Co.* that applying an extended statute of limitations to revive previously time-barred claims had impermissible retroactive effects.
2004-01-01
The Second Circuit rejected the defendant's reasoning in the Bahna case and upheld the conviction.
1995-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event