Event Details

January 01, 2007

Description

Evidence was evaluated by prosecutors in another jurisdiction.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
prosecutors person 54 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00005587.jpg

legal document • 705 KB
View

This legal document is a portion of a motion filed by the prosecution ('Government') arguing against the defense's desire to introduce evidence related to a past charging decision from a Florida investigation. The prosecution contends this evidence is irrelevant, cumulative, and would invite the jury to speculate, creating a 'bizarre spectacle' that distracts from the actual evidence of the current trial. The document cites case law to support its position that the jury should only consider the evidence presented in this specific case, not the prosecutorial decisions made in other jurisdictions.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Federal court hearing where declarant learned of the secret plea deal.

2008-07-01 • Federal Court

View

Deadline set by Acosta for prosecutors not to issue victim notification letters (5 p.m. Friday).

2007-12-07

View

The witness's very first meeting with agents and prosecutors.

2025-11-09

View

Prosecutors interviewed Epstein's lawyers.

Date unknown

View

Rodgers was interviewed by the government/prosecutors.

2020-02-07

View

An interview between Rodgers and prosecutors, where he was asked about a person named Jane.

2020-02-07

View

OPR investigated allegations that USAO prosecutors improperly resolved a federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's criminal conduct.

2007-01-01 • Southern District of Florida

View

A redacted party approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued.

Date unknown

View

Epstein was ultimately permitted to resolve his federal criminal exposure with a plea to a state indictment and one additional state offense, receiving an 18-month sentence, which differed from the original proposal.

Date unknown

View

A subsequent criminal prosecution where evidence from a prior civil case might be used.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
legal proceeding
Location
another jurisdiction
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:16

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00005587.jpg
Date String
2007

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event