Event Details
December 10, 2020
Description
Court Hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN)
Participants (6)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | person | 1588 | View Entity |
| Judge | person | 227 | View Entity |
| MR. COHEN | person | 88 | View Entity |
| GOVERNMENT | organization | 2805 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00001909.jpg
This document is page 32 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that the defendant is a flight risk because she successfully lived in hiding for a year and purchased real estate using a fake name without detection. The Judge (The Court) interrupts to question why this specific information regarding the evasion was not presented until the government's reply brief.
DOJ-OGR-00001929.jpg
This document is page 52 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. The defense attorney is arguing for the client's release on strict conditions, refuting the government's claim that the client is a flight risk or has been 'hiding out.' The attorney highlights that the client has been actively litigating civil cases since 2015 and denying impropriety regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001931.jpg
This document is page 54 of a court transcript filed on December 10, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues that the defense had previously urged the government not to indict and had made it clear they were available for voluntary surrender, yet the government arrested Maxwell without prior contact. Cohen notes that the government was fully aware that his firm and Haddon Morgan represented Maxwell, and he criticizes the prosecution for trying to 'throw some more dirt' on his client in a reply brief.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
2021-01-31
A summation by Ms. Moe recounting Jane's testimony was filed with the court.
2022-08-10
Government conducted additional investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4, including interviewing additional witnesses, reviewing documents, and subpoenaing additional records.
2021-03-31
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.
2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event