Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The central legal proceeding where the defendant's involvement in abuse was at issue.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAXWELL | person | 1792 | View Entity |
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021130.jpg
This legal document, part of case 22-1426, argues that the District Court abused its discretion during a post-trial hearing. The filing contends that the court improperly prevented the defense from cross-examining Juror 50, who, it is argued, would have been dismissed from the jury had he truthfully disclosed the nature of his past abuse during jury selection. The document contrasts the severe abuse suffered by Juror 50 with lesser forms of sexual assault reported by other potential jurors who were not dismissed.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied as moot.
2020-10-19
Carolyn testifies that Maxwell, two of Mr. Epstein's friends, and two other girls saw her fully naked in a massage room.
Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house
Early phase of the conspiracy where Maxwell and Epstein identified, isolated, groomed, and sexually abused vulnerable girls.
1994-01-01
Later phase of the scheme where Maxwell and Epstein developed a stream of girls who recruited each other to visit Epstein's Palm Beach residence, where they were paid.
2001-01-01 • Palm Beach residence
Carolyn testifies that Maxwell touched her breasts on one of the occasions she was seen naked in the massage room.
Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house
Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061
2020-10-02 • Court
Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order
2020-10-02 • District Court
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event