Date Unknown
The defense submitted a financial report showing the defendant has approximately $22 million in assets.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| unnamed defendant | person | 51 | View Entity |
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00001168.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a defendant's proposed bail package. The prosecution contends that the defendant is a significant flight risk because a new financial report reveals she has approximately $22 million in assets, far more than previously disclosed, including a $2 million London townhouse and over $4 million in unrestrained funds. The Government further argues that the bond is effectively worthless because two proposed co-signers are UK residents, against whom the bond could not be realistically recovered if the defendant were to flee.
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
A trial where the Government plans to use certain statements and evidence, which is the subject of the defense's motion.
Date unknown
A rebuttal is given by Ms. Comey in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Date unknown • Court
An officer observed a vehicle improperly parked, conducted a traffic stop, detected the odor of marijuana, questioned the five occupants, and arrested the defendant after she admitted to possessing marijuana and paraphernalia.
2005-09-11 • 200 block of Bahama Lane
Government's motion, which the defense is largely ignoring precedent for
Date unknown
The Government provided the defense with comprehensive Jencks Act material for trial witnesses and its exhibits, along with a letter.
2021-10-11
The document discusses arguments and evidence to be presented at an upcoming trial, including the Government's intention to argue certain individuals are co-conspirators.
Date unknown
The defense submitted a financial report reflecting the defendant's assets.
Date unknown
Acosta advises the Defense that the USAO will defer to the State Attorney regarding victim notification for the State Plea Hearing, but the USAO would notify victims of the Federal Resolution.
2007-12-19
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event