Event Details

January 01, 2019

Description

Superior Court affirmed the judgment of sentence against Cosby.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Cosby person 76 View Entity
Superior Court person 0 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00004852.jpg

Legal Filing / Court Opinion Exhibit • 755 KB
View

This document is Page 40 of 80 from a legal filing (Exhibit) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330), filed on July 2, 2021. The text is an excerpt from a legal opinion regarding *Commonwealth v. Cosby*, discussing the procedural history of Bill Cosby's appeal and the legal standards for admitting 'prior bad acts' evidence under Rule 404(b) and the 'common plan, scheme, or design' exception. It cites precedents *Commonwealth v. Miller* and *Commonwealth v. Tyson* to analyze how such evidence is used to establish identity or counter defenses of consent.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Cosby filed notice of appeal and petition for review

Date unknown • Superior Court

View

Constad filed a police report accusing Cosby of sexual assault.

Date unknown

View

Constad telephoned Cosby and secretly recorded the conversation, during which Cosby offered assistance for sports broadcasting, to pay for her education, and asked for a meeting. Cosby also refused to identify pills he had provided.

Date unknown

View

Cosby provided pills to Constad and refused to identify them.

Date unknown

View

Cosby testified in four depositions in Constand’s civil case without ever invoking his Fifth Amendment rights.

Date unknown

View

Alleged prior bad acts/sexual assaults by Cosby involving multiple victims, used as evidence of a 'predictable pattern'.

1980-01-01 • hotel rooms or at the home of a third party

View

Incident involving Cosby and Constad, which occurred in Cosby's home.

Date unknown • Cosby's home

View

Investigation of Cosby and subsequent agreement not to prosecute to facilitate civil deposition.

Date unknown • Pennsylvania (implied by 'Commonwealth')

View

A civil action where Cosby was forced to testify under penalty of perjury, without Fifth Amendment privilege, after D.A. Castor declined criminal prosecution.

Date unknown

View

Cosby's criminal trial where D.A. Castor's successors used Cosby's prior sworn inculpatory testimony against him, and five witnesses testified about similar sexually abusive patterns.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Pennsylvania
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 22:21

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00004852.jpg
Date String
2019

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event