Event Details

Unknown (Past)

Description

Deliberations

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Jurors person 122 View Entity
Juror 50 person 685 View Entity

Source Documents (2)

DOJ-OGR-00009652.jpg

Legal Filing / Court Correspondence • 567 KB
View

This document is page 15 of a legal filing (Document 636) from March 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains a list of proposed questions to be asked of 'Juror 50' (identified as male) regarding whether his history of childhood sexual abuse, involvement in victim advocacy, or therapy history affected his impartiality during the trial. The text argues that direct questions about fairness yield self-serving answers and proposes specific inquiries into the impact of the abuse on his life and relationships.

DOJ-OGR-00011686.jpg

Court Transcript / Jury Instructions • 640 KB
View

This document is page 21 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It contains instructions from the Judge to the jury regarding their conduct, specifically forbidding them from discussing the case with one another or outside parties until deliberations begin. The text explicitly lists various communication technologies and social media platforms (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc.) that jurors are prohibited from using to discuss the trial.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status

2021-11-04 • N/A

View

Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post

2022-01-01 • Twitter

View

A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.

Date unknown

View

A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.

Date unknown • The Court

View

The speaker, likely a judge, outlines the procedure for the voir dire (jury selection) process, specifically how to question prospective jurors using a list of names of witnesses and entities.

2021-12-08 • Court

View

Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.

Date unknown

View

Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.

Date unknown

View

A hearing where Juror 50 provided testimony.

Date unknown

View

A close, contested trial involving Ms. Maxwell where the key issue was the credibility of the accusers.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-20 21:19

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009652.jpg
Date String
Unknown (Past)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event