Event Details
October 23, 2020
Description
Defense counsel visited Ms. Maxwell at the MDC to review images on a laptop. They were prevented from sitting next to her and were later told they could only pass her documents requiring a signature, not documents for review.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDC prison guards | person | 3 | View Entity |
| Team Leader | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Ms. Maxwell | person | 1982 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00001811.jpg
This legal document is a letter from defense counsel Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 23, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The letter complains that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) are severely hindering Ms. Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense by preventing counsel from reviewing documents with her effectively during legal visits. The defense requests the Court to order the BOP to allow them to pass legal papers to Ms. Maxwell for review and suggests a status conference to address these ongoing issues.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.
2021-02-16 • MDC
Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.
Date unknown • prison/jail
Ms. Maxwell sent a detailed letter requesting the production of discovery materials.
2020-10-13
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.
2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)
Indictment of Ms. Maxwell.
2020-01-01 • New York
Ms. Maxwell was arrested at her residence.
2020-07-02 • New Hampshire
Ms. Maxwell moved to stay discovery in the case 'Farmer v. Indyke' (No. 19-cv-10475) due to a pending criminal investigation.
Date unknown • S.D.N.Y.
An appeal challenging a protective order's bar on disclosure of information.
Date unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event